Does a Straight beat a Flush?
Objectives:
To stimulate a higher level of member participation in whole group discussions.
Procedure:
Some groups are reluctant to get involved in open discussions, specially if they are first time trainees, face a complex or threatening issue, or don't feel comfortable with the trainer yet. You can break the ice quickly, and stimulate broader (even competitive) group participation in response to your questions by simply following this method. Inform the group that they will have the opportunity to play one hand of poker at the end of each instruction module (or the end of the day). The person with the best overall poker hand will win some prize. One card will be given to each person every time they make a meaningful contribution to the discussion. Liberally reward participants with randomly drawn cards as they engage in discussion. Clarify the winning order of poker hands, and identify the best 5 card hand in the group.
Discussion Questions:
• What Impact did this technique have on your participation?
• Did this aid or interfere with your learning of the course material?
Materials: 2 or more decks of cards (depending on total number of participants & length of discussion)
Time: 5 minutes (to assess the best hands)
Objectives:
To stimulate a higher level of member participation in whole group discussions.
Procedure:
Some groups are reluctant to get involved in open discussions, specially if they are first time trainees, face a complex or threatening issue, or don't feel comfortable with the trainer yet. You can break the ice quickly, and stimulate broader (even competitive) group participation in response to your questions by simply following this method. Inform the group that they will have the opportunity to play one hand of poker at the end of each instruction module (or the end of the day). The person with the best overall poker hand will win some prize. One card will be given to each person every time they make a meaningful contribution to the discussion. Liberally reward participants with randomly drawn cards as they engage in discussion. Clarify the winning order of poker hands, and identify the best 5 card hand in the group.
Discussion Questions:
• What Impact did this technique have on your participation?
• Did this aid or interfere with your learning of the course material?
Materials: 2 or more decks of cards (depending on total number of participants & length of discussion)
Time: 5 minutes (to assess the best hands)
No comments: